Social-Political Issues
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests Unreliable
& Quarantines Unlawful – Media
Blackout
A Portuguese Court has this week ruled that PCR Tests [Covid tests – Polymerase Chain Reaction] are “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful”.
However, this important legal decision has faced a total media blackout in the UK and much of the Western world.
The Court stated, the test’s reliability depends upon the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concluded that:
“If someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.
The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.
The Court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.
The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40. This is also the case in Britain which I reported upon in September.
This case concerned the fact that 4 people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these,1 had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other 3 were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure. Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all 4 were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.
An appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.
Further, the ruling suggested that any forced quarantine applied to healthy people could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty.
It is a great tribute to the integrity of the Portuguese legal system that the Court seems to understand in considerable detail the shortcomings of the PCR test as a diagnostic tool, particularly when not used in combination with a clinical diagnosis.
This is something that Western Governments, their so called “scientific advisors” and mainstream media refuse to acknowledge or report. Despite the fact that Kary Mullis the award-winning Inventor of the PCR Test stated this test should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”
State broadcasters and mainstream media have also failed to report upon:
So you have to ask the question why? What is the agenda? Who benefits from this?
This article was first published on
Unity News Network
on November 21, 2020
From Another Source - Excerpts
Off-Guardian.Org
You can read the complete ruling in the original Portuguese here, and translated into English here. There’s also a good write up on it on Great Game India, plus a Portuguese professor sent a long email about the case to Lockdown Sceptics.
The media reaction to this case has been entirely predictable – they have not mentioned it. At all. Anywhere. Ever.
The ruling was published on November 11th, and has been referenced by many alt-news sites since…but the mainstream outlets are maintaining a complete blackout on it.
The reddit Covid-19 board actually removed the post, because it was “not a reliable source”, despite relying on the official court documents:
However, this important legal decision has faced a total media blackout in the UK and much of the Western world.
The Court stated, the test’s reliability depends upon the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concluded that:
“If someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.
The Lisbon Court of Appeals ruled against
the objectivity of Covid tests
The Court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.
The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40. This is also the case in Britain which I reported upon in September.
This case concerned the fact that 4 people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these,1 had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other 3 were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure. Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all 4 were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.
Forced quarantine in Spain:
Portugal shows good sense & objects
Further, the ruling suggested that any forced quarantine applied to healthy people could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty.
It is a great tribute to the integrity of the Portuguese legal system that the Court seems to understand in considerable detail the shortcomings of the PCR test as a diagnostic tool, particularly when not used in combination with a clinical diagnosis.
This is something that Western Governments, their so called “scientific advisors” and mainstream media refuse to acknowledge or report. Despite the fact that Kary Mullis the award-winning Inventor of the PCR Test stated this test should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”
State broadcasters and mainstream media have also failed to report upon:
- The Danish people’s victory against state-imposed medical tyranny through enforced vaccination and detention. (here)
- The long-awaited Danish report on the efficacy of face mask-wearing. (here)
- The results of a large military study undertaken into the effectiveness of the lockdown policy. (here)
- The MHRA’s Contract for an artificial intelligence tool to log cases of Covid 19 adverse drug reactions. (here)
So you have to ask the question why? What is the agenda? Who benefits from this?
Unity News Network
on November 21, 2020
Off-Guardian.Org
You can read the complete ruling in the original Portuguese here, and translated into English here. There’s also a good write up on it on Great Game India, plus a Portuguese professor sent a long email about the case to Lockdown Sceptics.
The media reaction to this case has been entirely predictable – they have not mentioned it. At all. Anywhere. Ever.
The ruling was published on November 11th, and has been referenced by many alt-news sites since…but the mainstream outlets are maintaining a complete blackout on it.
The reddit Covid-19 board actually removed the post, because it was “not a reliable source”, despite relying on the official court documents:
Posted November 27, 2020
______________________
______________________
 |
 |
 |