What People are Commenting
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New Strategy & Rossetti: UFOs Are Devils
Are UFOs Devils?
Do you have a document we can share with our pew sitters about UFOs/Aliens are demons?
D.C.
______________________
TIA responds:
Hello D.C.,
We have dealt with this topic several times as you can see, for example, here, here and here.
We believe the ETs who pilot the UFOs are devils, as we explained, for example, here, here and here.
A religious authority who recently confirmed this suspicion is Msgr. Stephen Rossetti, as you may read in the posting below.
We do not have a document declaring “the ETs or the UFOs are devils.” We have a general and strong suspicion that seems enough to prevent those with Catholic sense from falling into the trap.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk
______________________
Msgr. Rossetti: UFOs Are Devils
I remember you telling us several times that the UFOs are demons.
Recently we had an exorcist in Washington DC, Msgr. Rossetti, who said the same thing in a video [now unavailable]. This Monsignor received a disciplinary sanction from Card. McElroy, which speaks in favor of the truth of what he said. The Monsignor had to curb his head to his local superior.
I am forwarding to you an analysis of the article in the National Catholic Register that a friend sent me, which transcribes the text of what Rossetti said and explains all the details.
Kind regards,
C.P.
This action taken by the Cardinal of Washington, DC constitutes a flagrant abuse of his power and is an act of gross negligence as it relates to his fiduciary (spiritual) responsibilities towards residents of his Archdiocese.
He needs to be made to either rescind this action or relieved of his duties as the Archbishop of Washington, DC.
Above is a quick excerpt from a longer Youtube video he made about the topic of fallen angels and interstellar (ET) visitors (aliens). Directly below is a transcript I was able to find of the longer video. You be the judge. But let me quickly preface this by reminding EVERYONE that the Roman Catholic Church has NO formal position on the existence of ETs BUT it has a LONG history of asserting the reality of angels ….’FALLEN’ or otherwise.
With this said, here is the transcript I referred to ….
YOUTUBE TRANSCRIPT:
I had an incident not too long ago where someone who had a particular gift — and we've documented that gift — and she was shown a picture of a UFO. She said, "It's a demon. There's no question in my mind personally that probably many if not most of these UFO sightings are in fact demons." And they can do things that we can't do, such as the speed and all sorts of things that human beings can't do. Exorcists worldwide report consistent manifestations: demons appearing as "greys," mimicking aliens. They claim to be neither good nor bad, just "who we are."
I know other exorcists where they would in session, they would see that once the demon manifested, they would manifest in literally looking like an alien with the eyes and the small mouth and the whole bit turning gray. And they even call themselves gray. And they try to lie to the exorcist by saying, "Oh, well, we're not angels, good angels, and we're not bad angels. We're not demons. We're kind of in the middle. We're neither good nor bad." Saint Thomas Aquinas says that the demons can from the air form a body of any form and shape and assume it so as to appear in it visibly. If you strip the veneer of the alien aspect off, what you are dealing with is they are just demons.
The abduction scenarios that people describe with aliens are identical to the same things that demons do to people who are possessed. There's a danger here and I want to raise that, as an exorcist I want to raise that danger. And that is that demons like to hide.
The video features Msgr. Stephen J. Rossetti (or a similar exorcist associated with the center) discussing how many UFO/alien phenomena align with demonic activity based on exorcism experiences, rather than extraterrestrial origins. It emphasizes spiritual deception and the need for caution in interpreting such encounters through a Catholic lens.
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING controversial in what was asserted/opined in this interview . So why is this PURPORTED Catholic Archbishop weighing in on this matter in such an EXTREM manner ???
‘I THINK HE DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH”!!
It disturbs me, to say the least, that one who purports to be a Roman Catholic Bishop but gives lip service to the notion of ‘fallen angels’ and the demonic is in the position to make a move such as this. McElroy is clearly a political hack who knows nothing about the Church’ role in protecting its flock from demonic activity.
How can I assert such a thing? Well prior to doing so, I first searched the Diocese of San Diego’s website. San Diego is where Cardinal McElroy presided as a Bishop prior to being transferred to Washington, DC. There was no mention of anything related to exorcisms or spiritual warfare on the website… no did a typical web search reveal any either. It’s like the diocese is telegraphing “Demons, What Demons”. Then to be certain, I queried Grok (AI). This was the response.
There does not appear to be a publicly identified or appointed "Chief Exorcist" (or diocesan exorcist) for the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego (note: it is a diocese, not an archdiocese). Key Details:
- As of a 2011 report, the diocese’s chancellor stated that it had not encountered the need to appoint an exorcist, even after Vatican encouragement in 2004 for dioceses to train priests for this role. Many U.S. dioceses (less than one-third at that time) had done so.
- Recent searches of the official Diocese of San Diego website (sdcatholic.org), news sources, and other references show no mentions of a current chief exorcist, appointed priest, or related office. The site has no references to "exorcist" or "exorcism."
This is a gross act of negligence and a violation of the Cardinal’s (Spiritual) Fiduciary responsibility to his flock.
He should be shunned and reprimanded for this gross malfeasance of office.
More to come.
J.B.
Posted June 9, 2026
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________
 |
 |
 |
I sent an email several months ago with a question regarding Dr. Plinio. Anyway, I have another inquiry. I noticed that in 2021, you wrote that the goal of the SSPX is to ultimately lead conservative-minded people to accept Vatican II and the Novus Ordo.
However, now that the SSPX is performing illicit episcopal consecrations and entering schism with the Vatican, is this an indication that they have shifted tactics? The False Right perennially confuses me.
Cordially,
J.X.
TIA responds:
Dear J.X.,
Your supposition is correct. Indeed, there is a change in the strategy.
If the Bishops’ consecrations will take place, we see that the SSPX will lead its followers into a schism, into another Episcopal Church among so many others.
This will bring as a consequence a “housecleaning” of the place occupied by most of those who oppose the Council and the Post-Council in the Vatican II Church.
It speaks of a decision made by both Rome and the SSPX to allow Progressivism to surge forward to its final goal without having to slow its speed due to opposition.
It is clear change of strategy.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk