What People are Commenting
Kenia Married Priest & Nuking Berlin
Tuning the Direction to True Faith
TIA,
I love to read all the articles in your site very, very much. They have tuned my direction to the true faith of Catholicism. This is of crucial importance for us to live as an authentic Catholic.
Thank you so much once again.
With kind regards,
G.L.
I love to read all the articles in your site very, very much. They have tuned my direction to the true faith of Catholicism. This is of crucial importance for us to live as an authentic Catholic.
Thank you so much once again.
With kind regards,
G.L.
______________________
Conversions in the Golf Course
Dear TIA,
I need more Mary of Agreda booklets in English, please; at least 100.
I am having people walk up to me on the golf course months later after reading the booklet and saying they'd had a major conversion.
Bless you and thank you.
+JMJ+
D.M.
I need more Mary of Agreda booklets in English, please; at least 100.
I am having people walk up to me on the golf course months later after reading the booklet and saying they'd had a major conversion.
Bless you and thank you.
+JMJ+
D.M.
______________________
Italian Priest Marries in Kenia
Dear TIA,
Salve Maria!
This news just appeared on my X: an Italian missionary priest, Fr Sandro Ferretto, is leaving the priesthood. He went on a mission to Kenya, met a woman there, started having an affair, and is now leaving the priesthood to marry the woman.
A video on X showed a clip from their wedding, in which Fr. Sandro Ferretto can be seen dancing with his new wife, including making obscene pelvic thrust gestures. The whole thing has sparked controversy online. Many commenters (perhaps paid people, or bots?) are saying "it is better to leave the priesthood than to desecrate the sacred office".
How much longer will it take before the Chastisement comes and punishes these priests for their depraved and scandalous actions?
In Jesu et Maria,
S.B.
Salve Maria!
This news just appeared on my X: an Italian missionary priest, Fr Sandro Ferretto, is leaving the priesthood. He went on a mission to Kenya, met a woman there, started having an affair, and is now leaving the priesthood to marry the woman.
A video on X showed a clip from their wedding, in which Fr. Sandro Ferretto can be seen dancing with his new wife, including making obscene pelvic thrust gestures. The whole thing has sparked controversy online. Many commenters (perhaps paid people, or bots?) are saying "it is better to leave the priesthood than to desecrate the sacred office".
How much longer will it take before the Chastisement comes and punishes these priests for their depraved and scandalous actions?
In Jesu et Maria,
S.B.

______________________
Convenience for Teenagers
Dear TIA.
Re: The SSPX: Excommunications, Excuses & Tricks
Whilst the absolutist stance of TIA in respect of the need for a papal mandate for the consecration of a Bishop is noted, I do think Dr Horvat is rather harsh in asserting that the confirmation candidates of the SSPX families should be content with the sacrament being conferred by a priest delegated by a bishop, probably located on an entirely different continent.
It is a grievous and needless spiritual wound to deprive devout teenagers of the immense privilege of Confirmation being conferred on them by a direct successor of the Apostles who have the full plenitude of Holy Orders.
Encountering the hierarchy in this vital Sacrament is a most powerful and affirming sign of the visibility of the Church which these families deserve to enjoy, far more than novus ordo Catholics, for their piety and dedication to tradition.
Yours in Jesus, Mary and Joseph.
N.M., U.K.
Dr. Horvat responds:
Dear N.M.,
Thank you for your email.
I believe that we must consider that the Church is suffering a great crisis, as Our Lady of Good Success predicted so precisely in her prophecies in Quito. Given this crisis, we should be prepared to make sacrifices, such as not having bishops for confirmation. The SSPX would do well to consider the circumstances of our time, and not enter into formal schism because of a convenience, but not a necessity, to have bishops for confirmation.
Surely, we pray and hope that better days will come after the intervention and triumph of Our Lady and the complete restoration of the Church, which she also promised at Quito.
Cordially,
Dr. Marian T. Horvat
Re: The SSPX: Excommunications, Excuses & Tricks
Whilst the absolutist stance of TIA in respect of the need for a papal mandate for the consecration of a Bishop is noted, I do think Dr Horvat is rather harsh in asserting that the confirmation candidates of the SSPX families should be content with the sacrament being conferred by a priest delegated by a bishop, probably located on an entirely different continent.
It is a grievous and needless spiritual wound to deprive devout teenagers of the immense privilege of Confirmation being conferred on them by a direct successor of the Apostles who have the full plenitude of Holy Orders.
Encountering the hierarchy in this vital Sacrament is a most powerful and affirming sign of the visibility of the Church which these families deserve to enjoy, far more than novus ordo Catholics, for their piety and dedication to tradition.
Yours in Jesus, Mary and Joseph.
N.M., U.K.
______________________
Dr. Horvat responds:
Dear N.M.,
Thank you for your email.
I believe that we must consider that the Church is suffering a great crisis, as Our Lady of Good Success predicted so precisely in her prophecies in Quito. Given this crisis, we should be prepared to make sacrifices, such as not having bishops for confirmation. The SSPX would do well to consider the circumstances of our time, and not enter into formal schism because of a convenience, but not a necessity, to have bishops for confirmation.
Surely, we pray and hope that better days will come after the intervention and triumph of Our Lady and the complete restoration of the Church, which she also promised at Quito.
Cordially,
Dr. Marian T. Horvat
______________________
Filling Divine Wrath’s Cup
Dear TIA,
Re: St. Pius X Feast Day
Pope Saint Pous X and Cardinal Merry del Val stood as the supreme vanguard, ruthlessly crushing the modernist wolves to protect the flock. The post-conciliar occupiers play the inverse role, acting as hirelings who open the gates and abandon the heritage to the devourers, twisting the iron made mandate of instaurare omnia in Christo into a fatal pascendi of the very wolves they sworn to break.
It is interesting that Our Lady of Fatima prophesized the impending disaster in the 20th century (the year She chose in which the Secret was supposed to be revealed was, uncannily, 1960). Even Garabandal speaks of the “filling of the cup of divine wrath” in the 1960s. So, Heaven has already warned us of the imminent danger.
Your thoughts on this?
Prof. V.S.N., Cambridge
TIA responds:
Dear Prof. V.S.N.,
Yes, we were warned many times about the coming Chastisement. You may check some of these warnings in the series The Judgment of Nations by Margaret Galitzin.
It is indeed imminent. We believe that God is waiting just for the numbers of the chosen ones to be completed.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk
Re: St. Pius X Feast Day
Pope Saint Pous X and Cardinal Merry del Val stood as the supreme vanguard, ruthlessly crushing the modernist wolves to protect the flock. The post-conciliar occupiers play the inverse role, acting as hirelings who open the gates and abandon the heritage to the devourers, twisting the iron made mandate of instaurare omnia in Christo into a fatal pascendi of the very wolves they sworn to break.
It is interesting that Our Lady of Fatima prophesized the impending disaster in the 20th century (the year She chose in which the Secret was supposed to be revealed was, uncannily, 1960). Even Garabandal speaks of the “filling of the cup of divine wrath” in the 1960s. So, Heaven has already warned us of the imminent danger.
Your thoughts on this?
Prof. V.S.N., Cambridge
______________________
TIA responds:
Dear Prof. V.S.N.,
Yes, we were warned many times about the coming Chastisement. You may check some of these warnings in the series The Judgment of Nations by Margaret Galitzin.
It is indeed imminent. We believe that God is waiting just for the numbers of the chosen ones to be completed.
Cordially,
TIA correspondence desk
______________________
Nuking Leipzig & Berlin
Dear TIA,
This week we have seen German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt accusing Russia of placing three drones with bombs in the Leipzig airport. He presented substantial evidence for his accusation, and other European leaders came to his support. He promised severe measures against Russia, starting with the closing of the Russian consulates in Bonn and Berlin.
In response to the measures Germany is taking, Russia retaliated verbally by means of Dmitry Medvedev, in charge of the Russian nuclear arsenal. He threatened to bomb Leipzig and Berlin.
Let us not forget that this picture is a close clone to how Germany and Russia entered into WWII.
We have become accustomed to hear political leaders say whatever they want without serious consequences. Perhaps this trend does not apply to Germany… At least, this is my suspicion.
Read below, please
Best regards,
P.M.
Russian firebrand calls for strikes on German factories
as hybrid war on NATO intensifies
Mike Glenn and Guy Taylor
A suggestion that Russia should bomb Berlin – a new verbal sucker punch from the Kremlin’s designated provocateur- at-large, Dmitry Medvedev – is the latest volley in Russia’s ever-growing hybrid war on Europe.
Moscow’s low-grade conflict, aimed at intimidating Europe and testing NATO’s collective resilience, has intensified in recent weeks with aggressive rhetoric, relentless cyberattacks, drone incursions and sabotage.
On Wednesday, Mr. Medvedev, a former Russian president who serves as deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, blasted NATO member Germany on social media after authorities there said the Kremlin was behind an attempted Aug. 4 drone attack on Leipzig/Halle Airport.
“Berlin has accused Russia of an unproven attack on Leipzig Airport,” Mr. Medvedev said on his Telegram page. “Given the neo-Nazi, rabidly Russophobic policies of the current German leadership, a fabricated act of sabotage is the weakest form of punishment for their sins.”
He said Germany deserves a “direct strike” on factories supplying arms and munitions to Ukraine, “and quite possibly, several other locations in Berlin as well.”
The explicit public threat of a direct Russian assault on Germany, a major U.S. and NATO ally, was made a week after CIA Director John Ratcliffe made a surprise visit to Moscow to meet with Russian intelligence officials.
Although President Trump has said Mr. Ratcliffe made the trip as part of an ongoing push by the administration to end the Ukraine war, speculation is mounting that U.S. intelligence has become increasingly focused on the prospect that Russia may be attempting to widen the war to other fronts.
Some analysts suggest Mr. Ratcliffe may have flown to Moscow to personally discourage his Russian counterparts from triggering an escalation.
Mr. Medvedev, meanwhile, was once seen in the West as a moderate. He now plays a role as Mr. Putin’s “bad cop” in what analysts describe as a carefully choreographed Kremlin propaganda campaign devised to stir unease and division within NATO.
His frequently over-the-top rhetoric allows Mr. Putin to appear more diplomatic and statesmanlike by comparison.
“Medvedev increasingly functions as a controlled ‘hawk’ tasked with articulating the Kremlin’s most radical threats,” according to a recent analysis published by the Robert Lansing Institute for Global Threats and Democracies Studies, a U.S.- and Europe-based think tank.
“In practice, he serves as an instrument of nuclear and psychological intimidation directed at Europe,” the analysis stated. “Even if many observers view Medvedev as a caricatured or erratic figure, the Kremlin values not moderation or credibility, but his willingness to act as a loud and aggressive transmitter of threats.”
Original here
This week we have seen German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt accusing Russia of placing three drones with bombs in the Leipzig airport. He presented substantial evidence for his accusation, and other European leaders came to his support. He promised severe measures against Russia, starting with the closing of the Russian consulates in Bonn and Berlin.
In response to the measures Germany is taking, Russia retaliated verbally by means of Dmitry Medvedev, in charge of the Russian nuclear arsenal. He threatened to bomb Leipzig and Berlin.
Let us not forget that this picture is a close clone to how Germany and Russia entered into WWII.
We have become accustomed to hear political leaders say whatever they want without serious consequences. Perhaps this trend does not apply to Germany… At least, this is my suspicion.
Read below, please
Best regards,
P.M.
as hybrid war on NATO intensifies
Mike Glenn and Guy Taylor
A suggestion that Russia should bomb Berlin – a new verbal sucker punch from the Kremlin’s designated provocateur- at-large, Dmitry Medvedev – is the latest volley in Russia’s ever-growing hybrid war on Europe.
Moscow’s low-grade conflict, aimed at intimidating Europe and testing NATO’s collective resilience, has intensified in recent weeks with aggressive rhetoric, relentless cyberattacks, drone incursions and sabotage.
On Wednesday, Mr. Medvedev, a former Russian president who serves as deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, blasted NATO member Germany on social media after authorities there said the Kremlin was behind an attempted Aug. 4 drone attack on Leipzig/Halle Airport.
“Berlin has accused Russia of an unproven attack on Leipzig Airport,” Mr. Medvedev said on his Telegram page. “Given the neo-Nazi, rabidly Russophobic policies of the current German leadership, a fabricated act of sabotage is the weakest form of punishment for their sins.”
He said Germany deserves a “direct strike” on factories supplying arms and munitions to Ukraine, “and quite possibly, several other locations in Berlin as well.”
The explicit public threat of a direct Russian assault on Germany, a major U.S. and NATO ally, was made a week after CIA Director John Ratcliffe made a surprise visit to Moscow to meet with Russian intelligence officials.
Although President Trump has said Mr. Ratcliffe made the trip as part of an ongoing push by the administration to end the Ukraine war, speculation is mounting that U.S. intelligence has become increasingly focused on the prospect that Russia may be attempting to widen the war to other fronts.
Some analysts suggest Mr. Ratcliffe may have flown to Moscow to personally discourage his Russian counterparts from triggering an escalation.
Mr. Medvedev, meanwhile, was once seen in the West as a moderate. He now plays a role as Mr. Putin’s “bad cop” in what analysts describe as a carefully choreographed Kremlin propaganda campaign devised to stir unease and division within NATO.
His frequently over-the-top rhetoric allows Mr. Putin to appear more diplomatic and statesmanlike by comparison.
“Medvedev increasingly functions as a controlled ‘hawk’ tasked with articulating the Kremlin’s most radical threats,” according to a recent analysis published by the Robert Lansing Institute for Global Threats and Democracies Studies, a U.S.- and Europe-based think tank.
“In practice, he serves as an instrument of nuclear and psychological intimidation directed at Europe,” the analysis stated. “Even if many observers view Medvedev as a caricatured or erratic figure, the Kremlin values not moderation or credibility, but his willingness to act as a loud and aggressive transmitter of threats.”
Original here
Posted September 8, 2026
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________














I got a tetanus shot and was told that it also has MMR VACCINES IN IT. I had no idea they included aborted cells until I mentioned that I got the shot to a friend.
Is there a way we can warn others?
B.P.