No, thanks
What People are Commenting
donate Books CDs HOME updates search contact

Novus Ordo Salad & Deep State’s Fingers



Akita & Fatima

TIA,

Someone mentioned to me he did not believe the vision of Akita was legit, especially in comparison to the miracle of Fatima.

What are your thoughts on this matter, and do you believe it tells what was not revealed in the 2000 statement from the Vatican.

I am discerning.

     L.C.
______________________


TIA responds:

L.C.

You may benefit from reading these answers we have made to readers – here, here, here, here, here and here – which explain perfectly our position on the Akita apparitions/revelations.

     Cordially,

     TIA correspondence desk


______________________



First Deaconess

TIA,

Here is an old woman, Phyllis Zagano, with a very masculine appearance who has just published a book on the “unresolved” question of women deacons.

She has great “hope” with Leo XIV, noting that at a 2023 synod press conference, then Cardinal Robert Prevost said that while the Church had definitively ruled against women priests, the question of women deacons was under discussion.

Prevost was following in the footsteps of Francis, of course. When Pope Francis called for an official commission to study the question of women in the diaconate, Zagano was among the 12 appointed. The commission first met in 2016, and at the final luncheon in June 2018 at the Domus Sanctae Marthae guesthouse, Pope Francis approached their table, thanked them informally, and asked who the first deaconess would be. The commissioners pointed to Zagano.

It is just a matter of time, it seems. I hope God steps in first with the chastisement, so needed for the restoration of our Holy Church and Catholic Civilization.

I am glad to see many young women are rejecting this kind of Feminism, and are strongly opposing actions like these. It is a good sign of the Holy Spirit working in the Church.

     M.G.

______________________



Novus Ordo Salad

Dear TIA,

Re: Revolutionary Purpose of the ‘Mystical Body of Christ’ Slogan

Oh, for the clarity of the 1943 encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi, in which Pope Pius XII defined the Kingdom of God on earth as the visible Catholic Church!

By contrast, in a typical ‘reverent’ Novus Ordo parish newsletter extract, one feels one is being ‘gaslighted’ into accepting a deliberately diluted and vague teaching that can no doubt accommodate finding the Kingdom being manifest in non-Catholic assemblies. Viz:-

The kingdom of heaven, so central to the preaching of Jesus, is illustrated, by our Lord, using various parables to help us understand something of its dynamism and growth. The challenges, as we see from the Parable of the Sower (last Sunday’s gospel), and from the Parable of the Weeds, which we hear proclaimed today, as the kingdom seeks to take root in our lives and in the world, show quite clearly that it is not to be understood, in the first place, as ‘some other world’, but is rather as a here-and-now reality; a lifegiving transformation that happens within; the work of the Spirit in space and time, which Christ brings about through his preaching and the signs he performs, so that people, places and all the circumstances of life become a worthy offering to the Father, which bears the imprint and the characteristics of his beloved Son Jesus Christ.

“The kingdom is Christ among us, and Christ founded the Church, in which “the kingdom is already present in mystery” (cf. Lumen Gentium), precisely so that his kingdom would continue to unfold in the midst of the world according to the gracious will of God. We do not build the kingdom, but rather we welcome it and, by God’s grace, do all that we can to allow it to shape us and our choices, so that its message might reach others and be for them the light they seek to guide them along the path of life.”


Something like this could have never happened even two decades ago. It shows where tolerance for sin and evil lead.

     Yours in Jesus, Mary and Joseph

     N.M.

______________________



SLIC & AIPAC - Deep State’s Fingers


TIA,

Re: Provision 219 Expands US-Israel Military Integration

Given your recent article on Provision 219, I thought you would like to know more about who is operating behind the scenes...

The following article is an eye-opening. I chose only excerpts of it.

     C.C.

Zionist Non-Profit Aims to Influence US State Lawmakers

Kurt Nimmo

In addition to controlling the Pentagon and US foreign policy, the Zionist state, through a newly created proxy, the nonprofit State Legislator Israel Caucus (SLIC), will influence state houses around the country. “Documents obtained by Drop Site News under the Florida Sunshine Law outline SLIC’s aim: to set up a system to distribute pro-Israel ‘model legislation’ to state lawmakers around the country.” [...]

SLIC might be viewed as an adjunct to AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC funneled over $28 million (in 2024) directly to the campaigns of members of Congress, and with its affiliates spent a combined total exceeding $100 million for congressional races. “While AIPAC frames itself as a group working to strengthen U.S.-Israel relations, it has continuously steered America’s foreign policy in the Middle East towards the priorities of the Israeli government, rather than those of the American public,” argues Jeremy Estrella for the Bruin Political Review.

AIPAC supports the so-called United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative, Section 219, formerly Section 224, of the FY27 House NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act.

The initiative expands Israel and US military “cooperation” in the realm of joint research, testing, manufacturing, and sharing technology, in addition to promoting joint military training, information-sharing, network integration, and data fusion.


Read more here


______________________



Rules on How Girls Should Act


Dear TIA,

Ave Maria Purissima !

When I was growing up in Ireland in the 1940s and 1950s girls were strictly disciplined. In family homes we were also punished more frequently by our parents because our standard of behavior was expected to be higher.

There were many rules which governed our behavior when outside the home:
  • We had to cover our head with a beret or headscarf. For our social class hats should not be worn as that amounted to "getting above ourselves"
  • We were to dress in a modest manner obeying the rules of Mary-like modesty, long sleeves, a high neckline and loose garments. We should not wear bright colours which would draw attention to ourselves.
  • We must hasten to our destination but not run.
  • We should walk close to the inside of the pavement.
  • We should keep our eyes lowered for fear of seeing something which might lead us to sin.
  • We must not stop to engage in tittle tattle or gossip with other girls.
  • We must cross the street if we see boys approaching.
  • If an adult stops to talk to us we should speak only when spoken to. We should never be forward.
  • We must never pass the church but rather enter and pray at least three Hail Marys.
  • We should return home at the earliest opportunity having completed our duty.
  • We must give thanks to God for returning safely.
Boys were not restricted like this and I believe this was correct. Boys when they grew up had to lead and earn their living outside the home to support their family. We had no such responsibility but these rules prepared us for the life of obedience which was required of a housewife in those days.

     God bless you all at TIA.

     Yours faithfully

     C.P., Ireland

Posted August 11, 2026

Share

Blason de Charlemagne
Follow us










______________________


The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA

Related Works of Interest