What People are Commenting
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Pope vs Trump & Microchip in Your Hand
Our Lady of Good Success
And troubles do oppress
Forget not that Sweet Lady,
Our Lady of Good Success.
She promises her succor
To those who do implore
Under this invocation
That hails from Ecuador.
She gives a light in darkness
In misery, relief
She promises a vict’ry
Dispelling unbelief
Mysterious, her secrets
She deigns now to reveal
To those whose hearts are humble
And burn with holy zeal
Her prophecies for our times
She willed to make them known
That we may see so clearly
The crisis we have sewn
The Church in tribulation
Her enemies within
Attempting to destroy Her
Her time now running thin
All Christendom in ashes,
The earth in agony
A World War III now looming,
While men chase vanity
“When all seems lost and paralyzed,
My hour will come”, she said
“To dethrone cursed Satan,
My heel upon his head.”
The Church again in freedom
Will reign on earth in hearts,
In laws and institutions,
In sciences, in arts
It is this Reign of Mary
For which we toil by day
Our hearts and minds unceasing
Bedecked in war array
By night we trust her promise
And yield not to dismay
In peace, we lie down knowing
Her help is on the way
Today we call upon her
Through heav’nly SOS
That Lady, meek and mighty
Our Lady of Good Success.
Salwa Bachar
______________________
More Evidence that Lefebvre Said the New Mass
Salve Maria!
__joana.d.arc__ on Instagram made a post that was a recreation of the article Pharisees and Sadducees by Atila Guimarães. I saw a comment that argued that Lefebvre never said the New Mass and that he not only signed but also directed the Ottaviani Intervention.
I decided to visit the pages which you can find here and here.
The first link references the article written by Jean Madiran. You, TIA, had previously linked the French version of this article in your original article about Lefebvre saying the New Mass but that you did not have time to read it.
I read this article that references Jean Madiran's article and found that it did not do a very good job of defending Lefebvre. While searching for this article, however, I found a Novus Ordo website with an article containing several references showing that Lefebvre indeed celebrated the New Mass which can be found here.
In it there are several references that suggest that Lefebvre said the New Mass. The most shocking of all is the first one which is an article posted on the official SSPX website itself:
“Or when I was a young subdeacon, I went with Archbishop Lefebvre to his sister-in-law’s funeral. The Archbishop hesitated, then chose to assist at the New Mass before blessing the casket. A few days later, an article was published in certain bulletins: We must rally! The example is given from on high! Born of the Conciliar Church through Bishop Charrière on November 1, 1970, in the Diocese of Freiburg [Switzerland], the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) has today returned to the Conciliar Church! Its founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, gave a beautiful example on June 30, 1980, by participating ‘actively’ in the Conciliar rite”
It would seem that the evidence for Lefebvre's support of the New Mass and Vatican II is present in many texts posted by the SSPX yet somehow their supporters constantly contest these truths.
Why did Lefebvre not just say: "Yes I signed the documents of Vatican II and yes I said the New Mass but I see now the errors of my ways and now I reject it?" Can the waters get any murkier?
In Jesu et Maria,
N.B.
______________________
Microchip in Your Hand, It Arrived
We have read that in Sweden people are receiving microchips in their wrists or hands. We thought: Such a crazy thing will never come here..
I was wrong. They are here. They are already being offered in Wisconsin…
Being approved by science or not, when you receive a chip in your body the chip’s owner became the owner of you as well. It is a way to enslave the person’s will and health.
Do not do it.
In Jesus & Mary,
P.M.
Implanting Microchips in Workers
The Washington Times
Susan Ferrechio - Friday, April 3, 2026
Wisconsin-based Three Square Market will soon offer its employees the option of having microchips implanted under their skin. The technology will work in tandem with computers, allow employees to pay for food, and open doors. (KSTP-TV ABC-5 Wisconsin screenshot)
What to know
- Some companies are implanting microchips in employees for convenience.
- Privacy advocates are alarmed by the potential for tracking and hacking.
- Washington recently banned mandatory microchipping of employees.
- Concerns include health risks and privacy infringements.
The technology sounds convenient and cool, but it alarms privacy rights advocates, and some states have moved to ban the practice.
In March, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson signed a bill that prohibits employers from requiring, coercing or even asking employees to have a microchip implanted for any reason.
“Microchips may seem like science fiction, but the technology is here,” said state Rep. Brianna Thomas, a Democrat and sponsor of the legislation. “It creates an opportunity for employers to track employees during work hours and at home. That is scary.”
At least 13 other states have also banned employer-mandated human microchips, and some have imposed stricter regulations amid growing concerns about technology’s increasing encroachment on privacy rights.
Nevada banned microchip programs, even for voluntary recipients, in 2019.
In addition to concerns about bosses tracking employees, the technology could be vulnerable to hacking, leaving microchip wearers’ personal, health and work information exposed.
Some medical studies found that the rice-size chips can injure tissues and tendons in the human hand and have been associated with tumors in laboratory mice.
Original here
Posted April 14, 2026
______________________
The opinions expressed in this section - What People Are Commenting - do not necessarily express those of TIA
______________________
______________________
 |
 |
 |
It is good to see Pope Leo XIV take a firm position on the war. He called all Catholics to contact their representatives to pressure the federal government to end this war with Iran. Here is the news.
In principle I do not have problems with wars, but this one is not our American war. We have zero interest in it. Trump was dragged into it by Israel which is using the US as its henchman.
Besides, Trump gave at least five different reasons to enter the war: help the rioters against the regime, change the regime, forbid Iran to enrich uranium, limit the numbers of missiles it can have, and take away its sovereignty over Hormuz. With so many dispersive goals – none of which he achieved, by the way – our troops do not know what they are fighting and dying for.
What is also a shame is to see the President of the United States acting like a caveman with our best allies in Europe and in Asia, offending each one, and even using profanities when addressing them. In a recent post on social media, he went so far as to offend personally Pope Leo XIV, I am sending you a screen shot of it.
I wonder if he lost his mind.
Anyway, as a Catholic I am glad that our Chicago Pope did not hesitate to face the New York businessman, who is occupying/destroying the presidency of our country.
In Christ Jesus,
E.J.