DEEPLY DISTURBING!!!

I came across your site which purported to be 'traditional' and yet I read numerous articles on it by women! How offensive!

This site is obviously just another ploy of the so-called 'Vatican II' church to deceive the faithful with liberal, modernist heretical nonsense. As I do for all the enemies of Trus and Authentic CATHOLICISM I will pray for your eternal damnation, although judging from your heresy-ridden site my prayers aren't in the least bit necessary!

May the God of all Love and Mercy inflict ever imaginable suffering upon you and all your progeny unto the thousandth generation!

In Jesus and Mary,
a TRUE defender of the Authentic Apostolic Faith

     I.J.S.

As a member of the Society of St. Pius V, WHO CARES what Mr. Ratzinger does?

He has nothing to do with traditional Roman Catholic beliefs.

J.S.



Wacky-Doodle
What a wacky-doodle website...

     T.W.

To Whomever It May Concern,

Your view on how the Catholic Church should not apologize couldn't be more correct. I mean, the torturing of Jews, Protestants, heretics, homosexuals and of course Native Americans - yes, this must be considered as a continuation of the Inquisition since it was performed with the same intention - didn't really happen.

After all there's no need to apologize for something that continued until the 19th Century and resumed under Nazi Germany (the Reich) between 1933 and 1945.... Oh wait, my mistake; that didn't happen either.

Maybe you should do some research on how the Vatican supported Moussolini (sic), or the Catholic Church sold apotheotic positions to wealthy land owners until the 16th Century; maybe you do some searching for a more substantial religion. Don't apologize for the Inquisition?

Ya, let's all forget about Holocaust as well.

     S.P.

Dear 'tradition in action',

I visited your site as I am attracted the idea of traditional Catholicism (I am a practising Catholic), however, I am absolutely appalled and shocked by your treatment of the late John Paul II in your section, 'Church revolution in pictures'.

You assume that his affection and tenderness towards females had sexual overtones, as I have noted below. Such disgusting innuendo coming from a so called Catholic site is quite unbelievable.

I e-mail you from Northern Ireland where we Catholics have to put up with ridicule, persecution and hostility for practising our religion from many anti-Catholic Protestant sects. And you mock the Pope with your leud suggestions that make these sects seem like moderates!

Your quotes: 'Another novelty of John Paul II in Morality was to frequently caress young women. In the picture above he caresses the chin of a young woman who came to greet him. In the picture below, he caresses another young woman being introduced to him by a priest.'

'One of the novelties in morality of Pope Wojtyla was to frequently kiss young women. In the picture above he seems quite involved with his action. Was he giving free reign to his affection? Was he fulfilling an item on the progressivist agenda? This Pope displays a familiarity with ladies never seen before Vatican II.'

I note the bias in your analysis of the pictures, 'frequently caress', 'frequently kiss', 'quite involved', 'free reign to his affection', 'familiarity with ladies'. You definitely have an agenda!!

Did it ever cross your twisted minds that all of this was innocent and it was in public display? Even the secular media never made such suggestions but I find these disgusting and filthy allegations in a so-called Catholic site. Have you ever heard of natural human affection and tenderness?

God forgive you for judging John Paul II.

     Yours sincerely,

     R.F.

I feel sorry to say it, in a way, and glad in another, but I wish you the best of all things. Thank *GOD* that there are people like you. But you are - (and unfortunately you represent others as well) - a strange, pitful and *little* person. I emphasize *little.*

God bless and enlighten you. Thank you for helping me understand the value of tolerance.

     L.S.

"Do not believe in anything (simply) because you have heard it. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. Do not believe in anything because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything (simply) because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all then accept it and live up to it."

The Buddha

On the Shiva Linga

Oh wow! Here we go again. What makes Hindu deities false? Huh? What makes the Bible so right? There was 150 year reformation on the Bible and the Catholic Church not the Gita or the hindu mandir (temple). Martin Luther wrote 99 things wrong about the Bible.

Christians have no miracles they can look to but they have "faith".

Our sacred idols drank milk all over the world back in 1995. You have no right calling our religion false or pagan. Follow your religion but don't criticize ours.

Missionaries have no right going to India destroying Hindu temples, slaughtering cows (which is a sacred animal) and forcing their religion on POOR people. Missionaries are no different from nazis. India is HINDUSTAN not CHRISTAINSTAN.

You people worship 3 gods: the father, the son and the holy ghost. That's three gods which means your religion is pagan. Judas kissed Jesus which makes him a bit gay. There is no question that Jesus wasn't divine but I don't believe he is the only way to heaven. Not everyone wants the easiest religion on earth in their lives.

     A.R.

Follow us

  Why Shouldn't the Pope Apologize for the Inquisition?

  The Caressing Pope

  Jonh Paul II, the Moral-Free Pope

  The Kissing Pope - I

  The Kissing Pope - II

  A Caressing Benedict Follows in the Steps of JPII