Fatima Issues
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Finally, the Truth!
As one might expect, the 100th anniversary has seen numerous books about Fatima issued around the world and an even greater number of articles written on what should be considered the most important event of the 20th Century.
One new book written in Spanish by Jose Maria Zavala, The Best Kept Secret of Fatima, is very significant. This is because it contains a detailed analysis comparing the handwriting of the Second Secret written by Sister Lucy to the one page Third Secret published and discussed extensively on this site seven years ago. The expert Spanish handwriting analyst, Begoña Slocker de Arce, concluded that the Third Secret had been drafted by the same hand as the first two documents.
Do we have the Third Secret of Fatima? I don’t see people in the traditional Catholic press reacting with questions and comments. They are strangely silent. What is their problem? It is the same type of response received when this site set forth the hypothesis that there were two Sister Lucys.
They don’t want to believe that the popes are “praising the Devil” when they do not conserve the dogma of faith, suggest and act like any religion is good for salvation and refuse to release the contents of the true Secret.
They don’t want to believe the Church is the enemy of Fatima because her hierarchy from the top down has rejected the entire message, which includes hiding the devotion of Our Lady of Fatima that was given to us to help us save our souls. They do not want to believe that the Church would rather gratify their ecumenical friends who reject Our Lady than save the souls of the faithful. Is it perhaps just too hard for them to believe that in the Third Secret Our Lady called the post-conciliar Church “ a Church of Hell”?
Recognizing the Fatima cover up
Thumbing through the Spring 2017 catalogue of the Ignatius Press, one can find a number of other books on Fatima highlighted due to the 100th anniversary that is quickly approaching. We can also expect many new articles on the subject.
Can you believe them?
All the information released about Fatima after 1958 has been controlled by those trying to destroy Our Lady’s message as well as the Catholic Faith.
If, in reading a book, you do not find the devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary including the five first Saturdays as part of Our Lady’s Plan discussed and highlighted, then, you are wasting your time.
The Vatican’s version of the Third Secret called “a bishop in white” was released on June 26, 2000, in the report titled “The Message of Fatima” (TMF). Most traditional Catholic writers soon added the fact that the Church only gave us part of the message.
The fact is they didn’t give us any of the Third Secret. The politically correct version is to say that the Vatican only gave us part of the secret, instead of stating the truth that it was a lie. They became enablers, perhaps not realizing that the Conciliar Church was the enemy. If you read these articles, do so with a critical eye.
The ‘Bishop in white’ message is not the secret
The “bishop in white” message is not the Third Secret. We can only speculate that at least part of that vision was written by Sister Lucy.
The Vatican says it was written by Sister Lucy in the TMF report, which is full of lies. It is hard to believe anything in that report. Nonetheless, the Vatican has had all of Lucy’s writings since 1957, so they could very easily have taken the “bishop in white” vision and called it the Third Secret. I believe this to be possible.
It is questionable, however, if the vision included the parts about an angel with a flaming sword that cried out "Penance, Penance, Penance" - words used by Our Lady at Lourdes. (1)
This might have been a vision seen only by Jacinta. She had two other visions of the Holy Father that the other seers did not see described in the book The True Story of Fatima by Father John de Marchi, I.M.C.
While she sat alone, she had a vision that disturbed her very much. When it had passed, she called out to Lucia, who was off a distance, and asked her: “Lucia, didn’t you see the Holy Father?”
“No”
“You didn’t? Well, I don’t know how it happened, but I saw the Holy Father in a very big house. He was kneeling before a table. He had his hands held to his face and he was crying. I saw him get up and go to the door of the house, but when he got to the door there were a lot of people swearing horribly at him and throwing stones. The poor Holy Father, Lucia, we must pray for him, too!”
On another occasion, the three seers were lying prostrate on the ground, repeating over and over the prayer of atonement taught to them by the Angel, when suddenly Jacinta leaped up and cried out:
“Francisco! Lucia! Can’t you see all those streets and roads and fields that are filled with people? They are crying with pitiful hunger. And the Holy Father is in a church, praying to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Can’t you see him?”
No, the others admitted, such a sight was not granted to them.
There are differences between the updated version of the Third Secret and the vision published in TMF. We have certain knowledge that the true Third Secret was written on one sheet of paper about 25 lines, while the “bishop in white” message is four pages long and does not contain any words that follow up on the last words of Lucy in the Second Message: “In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved.” Nor does it say anything about an apostasy in the Church.
In the TMF report, the Vatican explains to us that the text of the “bishop in white” must be interpreted as a symbolic key like what is found in Sacred Scripture, which does not describe photographically the details of future events. They are either desperate, dreaming or lying, for it describes very clearly a future event.
It was Our Lord Himself who in August 1931 informed Sister Lucy in Rianjo, Spain: “Make it known to My ministers that if they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command, then, they will follow him into misfortune.”
The King lost his Monarchy and three years later he was beheaded.
The Vatican Third Secret portrays “a bishop in white” reaching the top of the mountain; there, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he is killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him. After him and and in the same way one after another the other Bishops, Priests and Religious who climbed the mountain with him died.
Would this be the way those responsible for the Conciliar Church should die? We don’t know. We can only wait and see.
An expert handwriting analyst showed this 3rd secret is Sister Lucy's. Read the ‘deciphered third secret’ here
Do we have the Third Secret of Fatima? I don’t see people in the traditional Catholic press reacting with questions and comments. They are strangely silent. What is their problem? It is the same type of response received when this site set forth the hypothesis that there were two Sister Lucys.
They don’t want to believe that the popes are “praising the Devil” when they do not conserve the dogma of faith, suggest and act like any religion is good for salvation and refuse to release the contents of the true Secret.
They don’t want to believe the Church is the enemy of Fatima because her hierarchy from the top down has rejected the entire message, which includes hiding the devotion of Our Lady of Fatima that was given to us to help us save our souls. They do not want to believe that the Church would rather gratify their ecumenical friends who reject Our Lady than save the souls of the faithful. Is it perhaps just too hard for them to believe that in the Third Secret Our Lady called the post-conciliar Church “ a Church of Hell”?
Recognizing the Fatima cover up
Thumbing through the Spring 2017 catalogue of the Ignatius Press, one can find a number of other books on Fatima highlighted due to the 100th anniversary that is quickly approaching. We can also expect many new articles on the subject.
Messages of hope, repeating the Vatican line - these books ignore the prediction of a chastisement and an apostasy in the Church
All the information released about Fatima after 1958 has been controlled by those trying to destroy Our Lady’s message as well as the Catholic Faith.
If, in reading a book, you do not find the devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary including the five first Saturdays as part of Our Lady’s Plan discussed and highlighted, then, you are wasting your time.
The Vatican’s version of the Third Secret called “a bishop in white” was released on June 26, 2000, in the report titled “The Message of Fatima” (TMF). Most traditional Catholic writers soon added the fact that the Church only gave us part of the message.
The fact is they didn’t give us any of the Third Secret. The politically correct version is to say that the Vatican only gave us part of the secret, instead of stating the truth that it was a lie. They became enablers, perhaps not realizing that the Conciliar Church was the enemy. If you read these articles, do so with a critical eye.
The ‘Bishop in white’ message is not the secret
The “bishop in white” message is not the Third Secret. We can only speculate that at least part of that vision was written by Sister Lucy.
The Vatican says it was written by Sister Lucy in the TMF report, which is full of lies. It is hard to believe anything in that report. Nonetheless, the Vatican has had all of Lucy’s writings since 1957, so they could very easily have taken the “bishop in white” vision and called it the Third Secret. I believe this to be possible.
It is questionable, however, if the vision included the parts about an angel with a flaming sword that cried out "Penance, Penance, Penance" - words used by Our Lady at Lourdes. (1)
The bishop in white depicted in the DVD Finding Fatima
While she sat alone, she had a vision that disturbed her very much. When it had passed, she called out to Lucia, who was off a distance, and asked her: “Lucia, didn’t you see the Holy Father?”
“No”
“You didn’t? Well, I don’t know how it happened, but I saw the Holy Father in a very big house. He was kneeling before a table. He had his hands held to his face and he was crying. I saw him get up and go to the door of the house, but when he got to the door there were a lot of people swearing horribly at him and throwing stones. The poor Holy Father, Lucia, we must pray for him, too!”
On another occasion, the three seers were lying prostrate on the ground, repeating over and over the prayer of atonement taught to them by the Angel, when suddenly Jacinta leaped up and cried out:
“Francisco! Lucia! Can’t you see all those streets and roads and fields that are filled with people? They are crying with pitiful hunger. And the Holy Father is in a church, praying to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Can’t you see him?”
No, the others admitted, such a sight was not granted to them.
There are differences between the updated version of the Third Secret and the vision published in TMF. We have certain knowledge that the true Third Secret was written on one sheet of paper about 25 lines, while the “bishop in white” message is four pages long and does not contain any words that follow up on the last words of Lucy in the Second Message: “In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved.” Nor does it say anything about an apostasy in the Church.
In the TMF report, the Vatican explains to us that the text of the “bishop in white” must be interpreted as a symbolic key like what is found in Sacred Scripture, which does not describe photographically the details of future events. They are either desperate, dreaming or lying, for it describes very clearly a future event.
It was Our Lord Himself who in August 1931 informed Sister Lucy in Rianjo, Spain: “Make it known to My ministers that if they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command, then, they will follow him into misfortune.”
The King lost his Monarchy and three years later he was beheaded.
The Vatican Third Secret portrays “a bishop in white” reaching the top of the mountain; there, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he is killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him. After him and and in the same way one after another the other Bishops, Priests and Religious who climbed the mountain with him died.
Would this be the way those responsible for the Conciliar Church should die? We don’t know. We can only wait and see.
- This part of TMF reads: "After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'
"And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God." (The Message of Fatima, Vatican website)
Posted May 10, 2017
______________________
______________________
______________________